Goodbye and thanks, Steve Sox offence lacks ‘extra’ spark vs. Halos
Oct 08

The Boston Red Sox are quite familiar opponents for the Los Angeles Angels in the American League Division Series. However, all those previous matchups resulted in Red Sox series wins.

The key for the Red Sox this time is pitching. Jon Lester, who opens the series, has to keep guys off base, especially the guys who can run. Jacoby Ellsbury will be a key factor against Angels starter John Lackey. If Ellsbury gets on base, he’s going to steal. He will need to use his legs to create runs. Even though Lackey struggles against Boston, he has done some pretty good things in the postseason, including when he stepped up in 2002 and the Angels won the World Series.

Another important point the Red Sox must consider is to allow Lester to go deep in the game. That way, manager Terry Francona can mix and match his bullpen.

The key for the Angels is to focus on running. They have to get guys on base, from Chone Figgins to Erick Aybar to Bobby Abreu to Torii Hunter. They will have to make offence by taking the double play away from Lester, thus making him more concerned about the runners than he is about the hitter.

Keep in mind that Boston’s pitchers don’t keep runners close. They are very easy to run on. If you look at how the Angels played this year, that’s how they won a lot of games. They showed a lot more patience at the plate. Overall, their on-base percentage is higher than it’s ever been, but they ran, and that’s what they will have to do to beat Boston. If the Angels try to sit back and outscore Boston, they will fail because the Red Sox just have too much firepower in the middle of their lineup. The Angels will have to run and run and run. If they make it a track meet, they will beat the Red Sox.

Lackey and Josh Beckett are capable of demoralising a team, and it’s unclear whether the Angels have that shutdown pitcher to counter it.

If Victor Martinez or Jason Varitek can handle those baserunners, it’s over. In other words, if the Red Sox can beat the Angels with one of their weaknesses, there’s nothing Los Angeles can do.

The first game is in Anaheim, but that won’t make a difference. The Angels have yet to prove they can beat the Red Sox. If Boston jumps out early, for example, let’s say Ellsbury leads off with a hit, steals a base and scores a run – don’t be surprised if some of the L.A. players look at each other and say, “Oh no, here they come.”

218 Responses to “Angels have to run against the Red Sox to have a chance”

  1. carlos says:

    wolcyrz@skulled.abolitionist” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñýíêñ çà èíôó!…

  2. tyler says:

    kulturbund@glistening.smirked” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñýíêñ çà èíôó….

  3. Milton says:

    lovable@interaxial.wearily” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good info!!…

  4. Glen says:

    findings@crushers.luger” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ….

  5. nick says:

    highways@revise.pilgrimages” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    hello!!…

  6. Rick says:

    norfolk@ernie.engles” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ!…

  7. leslie says:

    murdered@close.brandywine” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thank you….

  8. jackie says:

    misery@abc.bonus” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî çà èíôó!…

  9. Ron says:

    highlighting@midsts.adipic” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thanks!…

  10. Wade says:

    rudder@lamp.breathlessly” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ….

  11. Darren says:

    chen@resultant.angola” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó!!…

  12. Cameron says:

    kamens@reuveni.blending” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx for info….

  13. scott says:

    madaripur@je.senate” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñýíêñ çà èíôó!…

  14. sergio says:

    salami@concession.drunken” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thank you!…

  15. cecil says:

    sex@tunelessly.engagingly” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ….

  16. bradley says:

    kerchief@assns.murdering” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó….

  17. Joel says:

    loren@envious.rumors” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ!!…

  18. Everett says:

    fortescue@kneels.romp” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî….

  19. alexander says:

    thesis@taxpayers.economic” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó!!…

  20. Alfred says:

    eventuate@fundamentalism.antidote” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx….

  21. bill says:

    exonerate@jeremiah.adele” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ….

  22. carlton says:

    dynamical@postponing.engines” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðñòâóþ….

  23. Eugene says:

    reputed@adaptations.peacock” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ!!…

  24. howard says:

    cowrtiers@occlusion.partisan” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thanks!!…

  25. Brian says:

    fractures@skilfully.truthful” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðþ!…

  26. stephen says:

    combatant@toulouse.lavish” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó!!…

  27. ron says:

    irrigating@trimble.panes” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good….

  28. brett says:

    wiping@candidacy.conant” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thanks….

  29. michael says:

    homeward@did.mask” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ!…

  30. steven says:

    viennese@genuinely.dispersed” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñýíêñ çà èíôó!!…

  31. Mario says:

    polytechnic@shrill.hail” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ!!…

  32. dustin says:

    rechartering@brannon.suspiciously” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó….

  33. Ricardo says:

    castroism@disobedient.withered” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó!!…

  34. Phillip says:

    crickets@uneasiness.vagrant” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ….

  35. Dustin says:

    huxleys@cunard.subduing” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñýíêñ çà èíôó!!…

  36. Joel says:

    spare@mucosa.stratforde” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ!!…

  37. ron says:

    sharks@offsaddled.rumford” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó!!…

  38. russell says:

    attempts@doctors.ponderous” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx for info….

  39. jerry says:

    super@lews.uninominal” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ!…

  40. Brad says:

    reasoned@mules.brendan” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó….

  41. Alex says:

    tilting@acknowledges.drier” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî çà èíôó!…

  42. harold says:

    nightclubs@adjoining.cohere” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî çà èíôó!!…

  43. ronnie says:

    youths@contradiction.paraoxon” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    hello!!…

  44. lyle says:

    strive@ensue.observatory” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó….

  45. Freddie says:

    player@hypostatization.belatedly” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ….

  46. Shannon says:

    whigs@cusp.mustache” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî!!…

  47. nick says:

    rockport@mutiny.property” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ!…

  48. Fernando says:

    adamss@itoiz.substances” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî!…

  49. eduardo says:

    grandmother@progressive.keeler” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî çà èíôó….

  50. sam says:

    separates@disentangle.queried” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðþ….

Leave a Reply

preload preload preload